Short answer: the KEF Q Concerto Meta for better sound quality, the BIC America DV62si for the lower price. The KEF Q Concerto Meta ranks #11 of 131 bookshelf speakers, rated 4.6/5, at $1,399.99. The BIC America DV62si ranks #119, rated 2.5/5, at $164.90, $1,235.09 cheaper.
What the KEF Q Concerto Meta does well: Really good in-room neutrality with consistent horizontal directivity from seat to seat. The catch: Radiation pattern measures about ±50°, narrower than the reviewer’s preferred ±60° for a stronger sense of envelopment.
The case for the BIC America DV62si: A larger-than-typical 6.5” woofer for the price gives it real dynamic headroom: the reviewer called the ability to play loud with strong bass a genuine strength, uncommon among budget speakers with smaller drivers. Watch for: CEA2034 spinorama shows uneven, elevated high-frequency response and what the reviewer called “the worst horizontal directivity plot we have seen”: direct and reflected sound diverge badly.
Buy the KEF Q Concerto Meta if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the BIC America DV62si if the price matters more than sound quality.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| KEF Q Concerto Meta | BIC America DV62si | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,399.99 per pair | $164.90 per pair |
| Ranked | #11 of 131 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #119 of 131 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 35Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 80Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Dimensions | 16.3”H x 8.3”W x 12.4”D (414 x 210.8 x 315 mm) | 14.25H x 8.875W x 9.125D in |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) | 8 ohms |
| Drivers | 165 mm (6.5 in.) hybrid aluminium cone woofer, 100 mm (4 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 19 mm (0.75 in.) vented aluminium dome with MAT tweeter | 6.5” poly/graphite-blend woofer, 0.75” ferrofluid-cooled dome tweeter |
| Sensitivity | 84.2dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Weight | 20.9 lbs (9.5 kg) each | 15.5 lbs (7.03 kg) pair |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | ported, Venturi vent |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.01 | 2.42 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.71 | 5.34 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Frequency Response | - | 43Hz - 21kHz -3dB (Manufacturer specified) |
| Power Handling | - | 10-175W |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to KEF Q Concerto Meta:
- TAD Compact Reference One (CR1TX) vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs Perlisten S4b
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs March Audio Sointuva AWG
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
KEF Q Concerto Meta: $1,399.99 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Really good in-room neutrality with consistent horizontal directivity from seat to seat. Directivity holds remarkably steady from lower treble into upper treble, where many similarly-priced speakers narrow sharply as frequency rises: one of the reviewer’s top 10 picks under $1,500. Measured bass extension of 53Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84.2dB.
Cons: Radiation pattern measures about ±50°, narrower than the reviewer’s preferred ±60° for a stronger sense of envelopment. Needs to be pointed closer to on-axis rather than heavily toed out: combined with its rolled-off, shelved-down top end, too much toe-out makes it sound noticeably dark.
Full KEF Q Concerto Meta review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 35Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 16.3”H x 8.3”W x 12.4”D (414 x 210.8 x 315 mm) |
| Drivers | 165 mm (6.5 in.) hybrid aluminium cone woofer, 100 mm (4 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 19 mm (0.75 in.) vented aluminium dome with MAT tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 84.2dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.01 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.71 |
| Weight | 20.9 lbs (9.5 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: HiFi Perfection? KEF CONCERTO META Delivers! More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner Website KEF Q Concerto Meta
- Erin’s Audio Corner: I Tested 250 Speakers So You Don’t Have To!
- Erin’s Audio Corner: HiFi Perfection? KEF CONCERTO META Delivers!
- Erin’s Audio Corner: My Absolute Favorite Products of 2024 Revealed
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs KEF R3 Meta
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs AsciLab F6B
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs Wharfedale Aura 2
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs Revel M106
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs KEF R3
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs Audio First Cadentia 3
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs AsciLab C6B
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs Buchardt Audio E50
- See all 104 comparisons
BIC America DV62si: $164.90 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: A larger-than-typical 6.5” woofer for the price gives it real dynamic headroom: the reviewer called the ability to play loud with strong bass a genuine strength, uncommon among budget speakers with smaller drivers. Impedance is comfortably high for the amplifier to drive. Extremely popular with buyers (429 Amazon ratings averaging 4.5 stars at the time of review). Measured bass extension of 80Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.
Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows uneven, elevated high-frequency response and what the reviewer called “the worst horizontal directivity plot we have seen”: direct and reflected sound diverge badly. Distortion is elevated across the board at 96dB SPL. The reviewer’s take: the elevated highs create an initial “high-resolution” impression that wins over casual listeners and drives the strong online ratings, but extended listening reveals harshness and grittiness; “I can’t recommend the BIC DV62si even though I understand why the popular vote is so strongly in its favor.”
Full BIC America DV62si review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 80Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 14.25H x 8.875W x 9.125D in |
| Drivers | 6.5” poly/graphite-blend woofer, 0.75” ferrofluid-cooled dome tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 43Hz - 21kHz -3dB (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Power Handling | 10-175W |
| Sensitivity | 85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 2.42 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.34 |
| Weight | 15.5 lbs (7.03 kg) pair |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, Venturi vent |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons