Short answer: the Kali LP-UNF. It ranks #44 of 100 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 3.9/5, at $349. The Edifier R1700BT ranks #84, rated 3.2/5, at $169.99, $179.01 cheaper, not enough of a saving to outweigh the sound-quality gap.
The Kali LP-UNF is the better-sounding choice. A practical compact desktop system with USB-C, analog inputs and Bluetooth, plus extensive placement switches. The catch: The 2.9dB midrange span masks local response ripples; listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.467 is behind the best monitors.
The case for the Edifier R1700BT: A compact powered pair with analog and Bluetooth connectivity for uncomplicated desktop listening. The tradeoff: Listening impressions suggest a bass-and-treble-forward balance rather than strict neutrality.
Buy the Kali LP-UNF. It is rated higher for sound quality, and saving $179.01 with the Edifier R1700BT does not make up for the sound-quality gap.
Still deciding? The full Powered Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Kali LP-UNF | Edifier R1700BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349.00 per pair | $169.99 per pair |
| Ranked | #44 of 100 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #84 of 100 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 54Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, USB-C (digital), RCA, TRS | Bluetooth, RCA Input |
| Drivers | 4.5” woofer, 1” Textile Dome tweeter | 4” (102mm) woofer |
| App | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| EQ | No | No |
| Weight | 17.2 lbs (7.8 kg) | 14.6 lbs (6.6 kg) |
| Sensitivity | 88.1dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.60 | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.67 | - |
| XLR Input | No | No |
| RCA Input | Yes | Yes |
| TRS Input | Yes | No |
| Optical Input | No | No |
| Coaxial Input | No | No |
| USB Input | Yes | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | No |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Dimensions | 10”H x 6.5”W x 7.4”D (254 x 165 x 188 mm) | 10”H x 6.1”W x 8.4”D (254 x 154.9 x 213.4 mm) |
| Amplifier Power | 160W total (Class D, 2-channel bi-amped) | 66w RMS Per Speaker |
| Frequency Response | 39Hz - 25kHz (-10dB) (Manufacturer specified) | 60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Outputs | - | None |
| Bluetooth Version | - | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth Codecs | - | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Kali LP-UNF:
- Genelec 8331A vs Kali LP-UNF
- Kali LP-UNF vs Neumann KH120 MKII
- Genelec 8030C vs Kali LP-UNF
- Kali LP-UNF vs Neumann KH80 DSP
- Kali LP-UNF vs Reflector Audio Square Two
Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Kali LP-UNF: $349.00 per pair Amazon eBay
Same family: the Kali Audio LP-6 V2 (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.4/5) and the Kali Audio LP-8 V2 (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.1/5).
Pros: A practical compact desktop system with USB-C, analog inputs and Bluetooth, plus extensive placement switches. Erin’s Klippel data gives -3dB bass around 54Hz and scores of 4.60 standalone and 6.67 with an ideal subwoofer. The low crossover and waveguide provide useful freedom of listening height for a two-way design, and moderate-level distortion is well controlled in the review. The 1.9kHz crossover gives vertical coverage of about ±30 to 40°, well beyond the typical ±10 to 15° of a two-way. Measured bass extension of 54Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.1dB.
Cons: The 2.9dB midrange span masks local response ripples; listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.467 is behind the best monitors. The review finds limiting around 91dB/1m per speaker. No dedicated subwoofer output means integration requires suitable external routing or bass management. Its strength is affordable close listening, not top-tier tonal accuracy or high-output room playback.
Full Kali LP-UNF review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 160W total (Class D, 2-channel bi-amped) |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 54Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 10”H x 6.5”W x 7.4”D (254 x 165 x 188 mm) |
| Drivers | 4.5” woofer, 1” Textile Dome tweeter |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 39Hz - 25kHz (-10dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, USB-C (digital), RCA, TRS |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Sensitivity | 88.1dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.60 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.67 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 17.2 lbs (7.8 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: The Perfect Desktop Speaker? Kali LP-UNF.
- Erin’s Audio Corner: The Best Budget Desktop Speakers, Tested & Rated
- Erin’s Audio Corner: My Absolute Favorite Products of 2024 Revealed
- Erin’s Audio Corner: 10 Great (and Terrible) Speakers Under $300!
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
- Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Edifier R1700BT: $169.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: A compact powered pair with analog and Bluetooth connectivity for uncomplicated desktop listening. Its self-contained design avoids the need for a separate amplifier.
Cons: Listening impressions suggest a bass-and-treble-forward balance rather than strict neutrality. Its analog and Bluetooth connections are less convenient for sources that require optical or HDMI input.
Full Edifier R1700BT review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 66w RMS Per Speaker |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.1 |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 10”H x 6.1”W x 8.4”D (254 x 154.9 x 213.4 mm) |
| Drivers | 4” (102mm) woofer |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, RCA Input |
| Optical Input | No |
| Outputs | None |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 14.6 lbs (6.6 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Audioengine HD3 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280DB vs Edifier R1700BT Sound Demo w/ Bass Test
- DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1280DBs vs Edifier R1700BTs Sound Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R2000DB Sound Demo
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier D12 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Edifier R1700BT vs Audioengine HD4
- Edifier R1700BT vs Kali Audio IN-UNF
- Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R1280DB
- Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier S1000MKII
- Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier S1000W
- Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R1280T
- Edifier R1700BT vs Edifier R2000DB
- Edifier R1700BT vs Midiplus MI5 II
- See all 63 comparisons