Short answer: the Juzear Clear, though neither ranks well in its class. Both are rated 2.9/5 for sound quality (#1025 and #1016 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Juzear Clear costs $44.90 against $59.99 for the KZ AS10, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it. Both are rated below 3.0/5 among the 1291 in-ear headphones, so if sound quality matters, consider the Intuaura Reference 2019 instead, ranked #7 at $34.99.
The case for the Juzear Clear: Bass is lifted about 5.1 dB with extension to 20 Hz, giving kick drums and bass lines extra weight. Watch for: A 6.6 dB peak near 11.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
The case for the KZ AS10: Five balanced armature drivers per side is an unusual layout at a modest price, and the bass sits about 6 dB above target between 60 and 200 Hz for listeners who want a thick, warm low end. The tradeoff: That bass boost spills into the low mids, 3.3 dB over target, which muddies voices and guitars, and a 6.4 dB peak near 11.9 kHz adds glare up top in hobbyist measurements on squig.link.
Buy the Juzear Clear. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $15.09 less than the KZ AS10.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
Bass is lifted about 5.1 dB with extension to 20 Hz, giving kick drums and bass lines extra weight.
HiFiGo $44.90 eBay
Five balanced armature drivers per side is an unusual layout at a modest price, and the bass sits about 6 dB above target between 60 and 200 Hz for listeners who want a thick, warm low end.
Amazon $59.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Juzear Clear | KZ AS10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $44.90 | $59.99 |
| Ranked | #1025 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #1016 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Balanced armature |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic (LCP composite diaphragm) | 5 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 14 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB/mW | 105 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 60 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 60 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.69 dB standard deviation | 2.91 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -1.15 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.89 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+4.7 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Juzear Clear from aftersound, audioamigo, ianfann, isaiahse, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, mmagtech, pw, timmyv and tonedeafmonk; the KZ AS10 from bassyalexander, dchpgall, melatonin and superreview, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How KZ AS10 compares with other leading options: