Short answer: both are discontinued, and they are rated the same for sound quality (#79 and #80 of 134 bookshelf speakers). Either one is only an option used, so choose on condition and price. If you want one new, the Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2 ranks #23 at $798.
Buy the JBL Studio 630 or the Behringer B2030P, whichever you find used in better condition; both are discontinued. For a new speaker, start with the Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2 instead.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| JBL Studio 630 | Behringer B2030P | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $699 per pair Discontinued | $220 per pair Discontinued |
| Ranked | #79 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #80 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Drivers | 6.5” PolyPlas cone woofer, 1” compression driver (2414H-1) with waveguide | 6.75” woofer, 0.75” ferrofluid-cooled tweeter |
| Dimensions | 14-13/16”H x 9”W x 11-5/16”D | 12.5H x 8.4W x 8.3D in |
| Weight | 19.8 lbs (9 kg) each | 15.4 lbs (7.0 kg) each |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 4.7 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 83.2dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 85dB manufacturer specified) | 84.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Frequency Response | 45Hz - 40,000Hz (manufacturer specified) | 75Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 54.2Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 98.1Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 37.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 50.8Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
| Power Handling | up to 150W | up to 100W |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.67 | 3.30 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.68 | 6.37 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Woofer Cabinet | - | ported, vertical slot |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How JBL Studio 630 compares with other leading options:
- JBL Studio 630 vs AsciLab C6B
- JBL Studio 630 vs KEF R3 Meta
- JBL Studio 630 vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- AsciLab F6B vs JBL Studio 630
- JBL Studio 630 vs MoFi SourcePoint 8
Prices on this page were last checked October 2, 2026 at 10:18 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
JBL Studio 630: $699 per pair Discontinued eBay
Pros: Excellent directivity linearity: harmonics of the same instrument stay collocated in the soundstage instead of drifting between positions, giving precise, stable imaging that holds up well into higher frequencies where many speakers start to beam and narrow. Good compression behavior: mid-bass stays taut and controlled from low to high volume without the sound falling apart or distorting as you turn it up. A pleasant, controlled mid-bass bump in the 60-100 Hz range adds punch to kick drums without bleeding into an uncontrolled boom on bass guitar. Horizontal radiation holds steady off-axis (about ±60°), so toe-in isn’t fussy. Compared directly to its predecessor, the JBL Studio 530, the reviewer would pick the 630 (smoother trend line through the upper mids and treble, and likely more dynamic headroom) as long as you’re willing to EQ. Measured bass extension of 54.2Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 83.2dB.
Cons: Noticeable mid-range dip/scoop relative to the higher frequencies: not dramatic, but audibly “missing” something by the second or third track. Some tracks read as forward or aggressive around 2 kHz, like the upper frequencies are jumping out at you rather than sitting in stage depth. Needs EQ to bring the mid-range back up to be fully recommendable; without EQ available, the reviewer says he’d look at a different speaker entirely. Measured sensitivity (about 83.2dB) runs noticeably below the 85dB manufacturer spec, likely a byproduct of the mid-range dip skewing the average downward. Discontinued and no longer sold new.
Full JBL Studio 630 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 37.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 54.2Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 14-13/16”H x 9”W x 11-5/16”D |
| Drivers | 6.5” PolyPlas cone woofer, 1” compression driver (2414H-1) with waveguide |
| Frequency Response | 45Hz - 40,000Hz (manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 4.7 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Power Handling | up to 150W |
| Sensitivity | 83.2dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 85dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.67 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.68 |
| Weight | 19.8 lbs (9 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- JBL Studio 630 vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- JBL Studio 630 vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- JBL Studio 630 vs Infinity IL10
- JBL Studio 630 vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- JBL Studio 630 vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- JBL Studio 630 vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- JBL Studio 630 vs Infinity Reference R162
- JBL Studio 630 vs KEF Q3 Meta
- See all 35 comparisons
Behringer B2030P: $220 per pair Discontinued eBay
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows strong horizontal directivity control, keeping the response nearly constant off-axis through most of the audible spectrum, with a wide beamwidth that eases seating position and toe-in requirements. Distortion measurements hold up well against the pricier Revel M106 at both 86dB and 106dB SPL. With EQ to tame a resonance around 800Hz and a bit of a bass fill, the reviewer called it a “winner” that could play loud without bottoming out. Measured bass extension of 98.1Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84.5dB.
Cons: A resonance around 800Hz shows up clearly in the on-axis response and the waterfall/CSD plot, and the flat, near-horizontal predicted in-room response makes it sound bright without an equalization target curve. Vertical directivity is only typical, not exceptional. Long discontinued: the reviewer noted you’ll have to hunt for a used pair.
Full Behringer B2030P review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 50.8Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 98.1Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 12.5H x 8.4W x 8.3D in |
| Drivers | 6.75” woofer, 0.75” ferrofluid-cooled tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 75Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Power Handling | up to 100W |
| Sensitivity | 84.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.30 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.37 |
| Weight | 15.4 lbs (7.0 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, vertical slot |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Behringer B2030P vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Behringer B2030P vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Behringer B2030P vs Infinity IL10
- Behringer B2030P vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- Behringer B2030P vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- Behringer B2030P vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- Behringer B2030P vs KEF Q3 Meta
- Behringer B2030P vs Infinity Reference R162
- See all 10 comparisons