JBL 705P vs Audioengine A5+ Classic

Last updated: October 6, 2026

Short answer: the Audioengine A5+ Classic. It ranks #36 of 100 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 4.0/5, at $399; the JBL 705P ranks #42, rated 3.9/5, and costs $2,198, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

JBL 705P vs Audioengine A5+ Classic

The JBL 705P is the deeper-bass pick. ASR’s data gives bass reaching -3dB around 48Hz and a 6.71 ideal-subwoofer preference score. Its bass reaches about 47.6Hz before falling 3dB, against 68Hz for the Audioengine A5+ Classic. The catch: The standalone score is 4.70, and a localized cancellation near 750Hz contributes to the large 7.8dB midrange response span.

The case for the Audioengine A5+ Classic: ASR’s A5+ Powered measurements give 4.59 standalone and 7.06 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.7dB midrange span. It keeps a wired aux input, which the JBL 705P lacks. The catch: The measured -3dB point is around 69Hz, and the upper-bass recession can reduce body in voices and instruments.

Buy the Audioengine A5+ Classic. It is rated higher for sound quality than the JBL 705P and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Powered Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

JBL 705P Audioengine A5+ Classic
Price$2,198 per pair$399.00 per pair
Ranked#42 of 100 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers#36 of 100 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-3dB)47.6Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)68Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-10dB)38.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions10.6”H x 5.9”W x 10.8”D (268 x 151 x 274 mm)10.9”H x 7.2”W x 9.7”D (276.2 x 182.6 x 247.6 mm)
Frequency Response39Hz - 36kHz (Manufacturer specified)50Hz - 22kHz (+/-1.5dB) (Manufacturer specified)
Weight12.6 lbs (5.7 kg) each15.4 lbs (7 kg) (left/powered), 9.7 lbs (4.4 kg) (right)
Drivers5” woofer, 2409H 1” compression driver5” Kevlar woofer, 0.75” silk dome tweeter
AppNoNo
EQNoNo
DSPNoNo
Amplifier Power500W total (250W woofer, 250W tweeter)50W RMS / 75W peak
Spinorama Preference Score4.704.59
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.717.06
InputsXLR/TRS combo (analog), XLR AES3 (digital)RCA, Aux
XLR InputYesNo
RCA InputNoYes
TRS InputYesNo
Optical InputNoNo
Coaxial InputNoNo
USB InputNoNo
HDMI InputNoNo
AES InputYesNo
Aux InputNoYes
BluetoothNoNo
Subwoofer Output-Yes
Outputs-RCA variable output (subwoofer)

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Audioengine A5+ Classic:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

JBL 705P: $2,198 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

JBL 705P ranking card

Same family: the JBL 708P (larger bookshelf, rated 4.2/5).

Pros: ASR’s data gives bass reaching -3dB around 48Hz and a 6.71 ideal-subwoofer preference score. Its waveguided compression driver and dedicated amplification are suited to studio use, and the broad response trend is close to level. It has useful low-frequency reach for a five-inch monitor. Measured bass extension of 47.6Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The standalone score is 4.70, and a localized cancellation near 750Hz contributes to the large 7.8dB midrange response span. A crossover-region rise also prevents reference-flat reproduction. An average flat trend does not erase these features, and amplifier wattage is not a measured clean-SPL rating. The data does not support calling it uniformly flat simply because it shares technology with larger JBL models.

AES InputYes
Amplifier Power500W total (250W woofer, 250W tweeter)
AppNo
Aux InputNo
Bass Extension (-10dB)38.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47.6Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
BluetoothNo
Coaxial InputNo
DSPNo
Dimensions10.6”H x 5.9”W x 10.8”D (268 x 151 x 274 mm)
Drivers5” woofer, 2409H 1” compression driver
EQNo
Frequency Response39Hz - 36kHz (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI InputNo
InputsXLR/TRS combo (analog), XLR AES3 (digital)
Optical InputNo
RCA InputNo
Spinorama Preference Score4.70
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.71
TRS InputYes
USB InputNo
Weight12.6 lbs (5.7 kg) each
XLR InputYes

Audioengine A5+ Classic: $399.00 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay

Audioengine A5+ Classic ranking card

Same family: the Audioengine A2+ (smaller bookshelf, rated 3.4/5).

Pros: ASR’s A5+ Powered measurements give 4.59 standalone and 7.06 with an ideal subwoofer, with a 2.7dB midrange span. The analog powered pair is straightforward to use without an external amplifier. The measured result supports a more capable tonal balance than its former low position suggested. Measured bass extension of 68Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The measured -3dB point is around 69Hz, and the upper-bass recession can reduce body in voices and instruments. The existing review reports crossover-region directivity errors and a distortion feature around 800-900Hz. The score does not make it a reference monitor, and adding a subwoofer cannot correct those midrange and off-axis issues.

AES InputNo
Amplifier Power50W RMS / 75W peak
AppNo
Aux InputYes
Bass Extension (-10dB)50Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)68Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
BluetoothNo
Coaxial InputNo
DSPNo
Dimensions10.9”H x 7.2”W x 9.7”D (276.2 x 182.6 x 247.6 mm)
Drivers5” Kevlar woofer, 0.75” silk dome tweeter
EQNo
Frequency Response50Hz - 22kHz (+/-1.5dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI InputNo
InputsRCA, Aux
Optical InputNo
OutputsRCA variable output (subwoofer)
RCA InputYes
Spinorama Preference Score4.59
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.06
Subwoofer OutputYes
TRS InputNo
USB InputNo
Weight15.4 lbs (7 kg) (left/powered), 9.7 lbs (4.4 kg) (right)
XLR InputNo