HZSound White Snow vs Tripowin Vivace

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 4.0/5 (#428 and #385 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($32.99 vs $29.90), so choose on features and fit.

HZSound White Snow vs Tripowin Vivace

The case for the HZSound White Snow: An inexpensive single dynamic IEM that measures well (score 74 across seven measurements) and comes with tuning filters. The catch: The current Amazon listing pairs it with a USB-C cable, so check for a 3.5mm cable if your source needs one.

The case for the Tripowin Vivace: The median of 5 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 1.82 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The catch: Presence sits about 3.1 dB low with a 5 dB dip near 10.0 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.

Buy the HZSound White Snow or the Tripowin Vivace on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

HZSound White Snow

An inexpensive single dynamic IEM that measures well (score 74 across seven measurements) and comes with tuning filters.

Amazon $32.99 eBay
$32.99
Tripowin Vivace

The median of 5 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 1.82 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.

Amazon $29.90 eBay
$29.90

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

HZSound White Snow Tripowin Vivace
Price$32.99$29.90
Ranked#428 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#385 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWired (USB-C or 2-pin)Wired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic1 x 10mm dynamic
Impedance20 ohms18 ohms
Harman Preference Score74 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)74 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target1.79 dB standard deviation1.82 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.63 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.58 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.4 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.5 dB at 30 Hz)
Sensitivity-106 dB/mW
Frequency Response-10Hz - 28kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Built-in Microphone-No

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

HZSound White SnowTripowin VivaceHarman target
Frequency response of the HZSound White Snow and Tripowin Vivace-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the HZSound White Snow from aftersound, elrics, fernandagunsan, pw, theaudiostore, tonedeafmonk and treblewellxtended; the Tripowin Vivace from aftersound, boizoff, filk, tdl and timmyv, all via squig.link.

More top alternatives to Tripowin Vivace: