Hidizs MP145 vs ROSESELSA CJ20

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Hidizs MP145. Both are rated 3.7/5 for sound quality (#638 and #679 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Hidizs MP145 costs $159.99 against $169 for the ROSESELSA CJ20, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.

Hidizs MP145 vs ROSESELSA CJ20

Why pick the Hidizs MP145: The median of 27 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 70 with a 2.16 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.6 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 3.9 dB low with a 4.7 dB dip near 3.6 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.

What the ROSESELSA CJ20 does well: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 70 against the Harman target. The catch: An uneven response, 2.2 dB standard deviation from target.

Buy the Hidizs MP145. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $9.01 less than the ROSESELSA CJ20.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Hidizs MP145

The median of 27 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 70 with a 2.16 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.6 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.

Amazon $159.99 eBay
$159.99
ROSESELSA CJ20

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 70 against the Harman target.

HiFiGo $169 eBay
$169

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Hidizs MP145 ROSESELSA CJ20
Price$159.99$169
Ranked#638 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#679 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired (3.5mm)
Driver TypePlanarDynamic
Drivers1 x 14.5mm planar magnetic1 Dynamic (10mm topological)
Impedance30 ohms-
Frequency Response20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)-
Weight0 lbs (9 g)-
Harman Preference Score70 (median of 27 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)70 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.16 dB standard deviation2.15 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.59 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.47 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.1 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.3 dB at 30 Hz)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Hidizs MP145ROSESELSA CJ20Harman target
Frequency response of the Hidizs MP145 and ROSESELSA CJ20-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Hidizs MP145 from achoreviews, aden, atechreviews, audioamigo, bedrock, boizoff, cammyfi, dchpgall, dl, eliseaudio, fahryst, hbb, hobbytalk, ianfann, jaytiss, kazi, lown-fi, practiphile, pw, rg, soundcheck39, soundignity, tdl, theaudiostore, therollo9, treblewellxtended and zerostresslevel; the ROSESELSA CJ20 from aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, hbb, jaytiss and lestat, all via squig.link.

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Hidizs MP145: