Short answer: the Hidizs MP143 Salt. It ranks #473 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.9/5, at $109; the Tanchjim Nora ranks #579, rated 3.8/5, and costs $109.99, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.
What the Hidizs MP143 Salt does well: The median of 4 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 73 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: Presence sits about 3.3 dB low with a 5 dB dip near 3.4 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
The case for the Tanchjim Nora: The median of 14 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.33 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.6 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The catch: A 4.8 dB peak near 8.4 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Buy the Hidizs MP143 Salt. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Tanchjim Nora and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 4 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 73 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $109.00 eBay
The median of 14 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.33 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.6 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $109.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Hidizs MP143 Salt | Tanchjim Nora | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $109.00 | $109.99 |
| Ranked | #473 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #579 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 73 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 71 (median of 14 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.05 dB standard deviation | 2.33 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.27 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.19 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.5 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.4 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Planar magnetic | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 14.3mm planar magnetic | 1 x dynamic |
| Impedance | 17 ohms | 16 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | 125 dB/Vrms |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Hidizs MP143 Salt from ankramutt, enemyspider, fahryst and tdl; the Tanchjim Nora from aden, aftersound, atechreviews, bassaudio, csi-zone, elrics, fernandagunsan, gadgetgenerations, hu-fi, iemocean, pw, soundignity, theaudiostore and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Hidizs MP143 Salt compares with other leading options: