GK Kunten vs TRN MT1

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the GK Kunten. It ranks #639 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.7/5, at $13.95; the TRN MT1 ranks #687, rated 3.6/5, at $13.95. Close enough in price that the sound-quality gap is the deciding factor.

GK Kunten vs TRN MT1

The case for the GK Kunten: The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 70 with a 2.07 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 4 dB low with a 6.6 dB dip near 5.8 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.

Why pick the TRN MT1: A preference score of 69 in crinacle’s measurement is a strong result for one of the cheapest in-ears around. Watch for: A 10.4 dB peak near 11.9 kHz in hobbyist measurements on squig.link can make cymbals sound tizzy and fatiguing at volume, with a 6 dB dip at 6.5 kHz just below it.

Buy the GK Kunten. It is rated higher for sound quality than the TRN MT1 at the same price, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

GK Kunten

The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 70 with a 2.07 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.

AliExpress $13.95 eBay
$13.95
TRN MT1

A preference score of 69 in crinacle’s measurement is a strong result for one of the cheapest in-ears around.

Amazon $13.95 AliExpress $14.37 eBay
$13.95

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

GK Kunten TRN MT1
Price$13.95$13.95
Ranked#639 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#687 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic1 x 10mm dynamic
Impedance43 ohms22 ohms
Sensitivity109 dB/mW106 dB
Frequency Response20Hz - 40kHz20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score70 (median of 18 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)69 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.07 dB standard deviation2.46 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.77 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.34 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.8 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.4 dB at 30 Hz)
Built-in Microphone-Yes

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

GK KuntenTRN MT1Harman target
Frequency response of the GK Kunten and TRN MT1-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the GK Kunten from aftersound, ankramutt, audioamigo, bassaudio, boizoff, digaoreviews, dvewlsh, enemyspider, eplv, fernandagunsan, filk, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, obodio, practiphile, sl0the, soundignity and theaudiostore; the TRN MT1 from achoreviews, aftersound, ankramutt, bryaudioreviews, dchpgall, hbb, hoods, jacstone, lown-fi, melatonin, musicafe, pw and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.

How GK Kunten compares with other leading options: