Fosi Audio IM4 vs Twistura Beta

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 4.2/5 (#260 and #274 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($99.99 vs $99), so choose on features and fit.

Fosi Audio IM4 vs Twistura Beta

What the Fosi Audio IM4 does well: The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.77 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1.2 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: A 4.6 dB peak near 8.2 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.

What the Twistura Beta does well: The median of 5 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.89 dB spread. The catch: A 4.1 dB peak near 8.2 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.

Buy the Fosi Audio IM4 or the Twistura Beta on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.

Fosi Audio IM4

The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.77 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1.2 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.

Amazon $99.99 eBay
$99.99
Twistura Beta

The median of 5 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.89 dB spread.

Amazon $99.00 eBay
$99

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Fosi Audio IM4 Twistura Beta
Price$99.99$99.00
Ranked#260 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#274 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score76 (median of 18 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)76 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target1.77 dB standard deviation1.89 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.23 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.15 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.7 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.3 dB at 30 Hz)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic1 x 11mm dynamic
Impedance21 ohms24 ohms
Sensitivity109 dB124 dB SPL/V
Weight0 lbs (7 g) per earbud-
Frequency Response20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)8Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Built-in MicrophoneNo-

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Fosi Audio IM4Twistura BetaHarman target
Frequency response of the Fosi Audio IM4 and Twistura Beta-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Fosi Audio IM4 from atechreviews, audioamigo, boizoff, digaoreviews, elrics, hu-fi, jaytiss, joycesreview, musicafe, practiphile, pw, samreviews, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, theaudiostore, tonedeafmonk and treblewellxtended; the Twistura Beta from audioamigo, hbb, practiphile, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.

How Fosi Audio IM4 compares with other leading options: