Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X vs Martin Audio CDD6

Last updated: October 11, 2026

Short answer: the Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X. It ranks #3 of 26 surface-mount and background music speakers by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $519; the Martin Audio CDD6 ranks #7, rated 3.1/5, and costs $550, so there is little reason to consider the other one.

Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X vs Martin Audio CDD6

Why pick the Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X: A weather-resistant (IP65) surface-mount installation speaker from Electro-Voice with a 5.25” woofer and a tweeter, for 70V and 100V systems or low impedance. The catch: Bass is very limited, so it needs a subwoofer for full-range music, and the on-axis response is uneven (1.29 average deviation).

Why pick the Martin Audio CDD6: A passive Coaxial Differential Dispersion speaker from the same Martin Audio CDD line as the measured Martin Audio CDD8 and Martin Audio CDD10: a 6.5” coaxial driver in a cabinet small enough for discreet installs. The tradeoff: No independent measurements yet, so it can’t be compared with ranked PA speakers.

Buy the Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Martin Audio CDD6 and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.

Worth knowing: the Martin Audio CDD6 has not been measured yet. Its rating is estimated from related models, with a likely range of 2.7 to 3.5, so treat this verdict as provisional.

Still deciding? The full PA & Live Sound rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X Martin Audio CDD6
Price$519.00 per pair Passive$550.00 each Passive
Ranked#3 of 26 in Surface-Mount and Background Music Speakers#7 of 26 in Surface-Mount and Background Music Speakers Estimated
RiggingU-bracket mount for U-bolt, threaded rod, pole or junction box4 x M6 inserts for wall/ceiling brackets
Weight6 lbs (2.7 kg)12.5 lbs (5.69 kg)
Maximum SPL115dB peak (manufacturer specified)119dB peak (manufacturer specified)
PassiveYesYes
BluetoothNoNo
Drivers5.25” woofer, tweeter6.5” woofer with coaxial 1” HF driver
IP RatingIP65-
Bass Extension (-3dB)150.0Hz (measured, manufacturer data via spinorama.org)80Hz (manufacturer specified)
Bass Extension (-10dB)about 81.6Hz (measured, manufacturer data via spinorama.org)-
Spinorama Preference Score2.44-
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.05-
DIY KitNo-
Configuration-Passive 2-way coaxial installation speaker
Power Handling-150W AES
Frequency Response-80Hz - 20kHz (±3dB), 70Hz (-10dB) (manufacturer specified)
Impedance-8 ohms
XLR Input-No
DSP-No (passive)
Amplifier Power-Passive speaker; requires external amplification

More top alternatives to Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X:

Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X: $519.00 per pair Passive Amazon eBay

Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2X ranking card

Same family: the Electro-Voice EVID-S4.2 (smaller model, ranked lower, rated 2.5/5), the Electro-Voice EVID-S5.2 (smaller model, ranked lower, rated 2.6/5) and the Electro-Voice EVID-S8.2 (larger model, ranked lower, rated 2.7/5).

Pros: A weather-resistant (IP65) surface-mount installation speaker from Electro-Voice with a 5.25” woofer and a tweeter, for 70V and 100V systems or low impedance. EV’s measurements show a preference score of 2.44 that reaches 6.05 with an ideal subwoofer, with 0.55 listening window deviation.

Cons: Bass is very limited, so it needs a subwoofer for full-range music, and the on-axis response is uneven (1.29 average deviation). The data comes from EV. Bass reaches 150.0Hz (-3dB) and about 82Hz (-10dB).

Bass Extension (-10dB)about 81.6Hz (measured, manufacturer data via spinorama.org)
Bass Extension (-3dB)150.0Hz (measured, manufacturer data via spinorama.org)
BluetoothNo
DIY KitNo
Drivers5.25” woofer, tweeter
IP RatingIP65
Maximum SPL115dB peak (manufacturer specified)
PassiveYes
RiggingU-bracket mount for U-bolt, threaded rod, pole or junction box
Spinorama Preference Score2.44
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.05
Weight6 lbs (2.7 kg)

Martin Audio CDD6: $550.00 each Passive Estimated Full Compass eBay

Martin Audio CDD6 ranking card

Same family: the Martin Audio CDD-LIVE 8 (smallest powered model, estimated 3.4/5), the Martin Audio CDD-LIVE 12 (powered model, estimated 3.1/5), the Martin Audio CDD-LIVE 15 (largest powered model, estimated 3.5/5), the Martin Audio CDD5 (smaller passive model, ranked lower, estimated 3/5), the Martin Audio CDD8 (larger passive model, rated 3.2/5), the Martin Audio CDD10 (larger passive model, rated 3.1/5), the Martin Audio CDD12 (larger passive model, rated 2.9/5) and the Martin Audio CDD15 (larger passive model, rated 3.3/5).

Pros: A passive Coaxial Differential Dispersion speaker from the same Martin Audio CDD line as the measured Martin Audio CDD8 and Martin Audio CDD10: a 6.5” coaxial driver in a cabinet small enough for discreet installs. CDD widens the horizontal pattern close to the speaker and narrows it with distance, which keeps level more even from front to back of a room.

Cons: No independent measurements yet, so it can’t be compared with ranked PA speakers. It needs an external amplifier, and its small woofer limits bass and output, so larger rooms need a subwoofer or bigger CDD models.

ReleasedJun 2015 (11 years ago)
Amplifier PowerPassive speaker; requires external amplification
Bass Extension (-3dB)80Hz (manufacturer specified)
BluetoothNo
ConfigurationPassive 2-way coaxial installation speaker
DSPNo (passive)
Drivers6.5” woofer with coaxial 1” HF driver
Frequency Response80Hz - 20kHz (±3dB), 70Hz (-10dB) (manufacturer specified)
Impedance8 ohms
Maximum SPL119dB peak (manufacturer specified)
PassiveYes
Power Handling150W AES
Rigging4 x M6 inserts for wall/ceiling brackets
Weight12.5 lbs (5.69 kg)
XLR InputNo