ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Klipsch RP-600M

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Short answer: the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2. It ranks #83 of 122 bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $329; the Klipsch RP-600M ranks #100 and costs $343.22, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

What the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 offers: Reasonably flat on-axis and listening-window response with reasonably even horizontal directivity, holding about ±60° up to roughly 8kHz for consistent stereo width whether aimed directly at the listener or toed out. Its larger-than-typical woofer lets it play very loud with minimal distortion, staying under about 1% THD down to 50Hz at 86dB, and minimum impedance stays a comfortable 5-6 ohms. In-room bass extension reaches about 50Hz without much trouble, enough for a solid kick-drum sound. Takes equalization very well - correcting the on-axis response doesn’t cost sensitivity through the midrange, and the underlying directivity behavior (diffraction, vertical mismatch) is mild enough that EQ alone gets most of the way to a well-balanced sound. Vertical tolerance is asymmetric and fairly forgiving: about 10° above the tweeter axis and 20° below it before tonal balance meaningfully shifts. One reviewer called it “a good speaker” with “a good price” rather than just good-for-the-price, and found it fairly neutral overall in-room. Watch for: A good size resonant peak around 700Hz stands out from an otherwise smooth response and lingers in cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) measurements - in one reviewer’s sighted A/B test, reducing it by about 5dB via EQ made a noticeable but not dramatic difference. Directivity error shows up around 3.3kHz, and the upper-midrange around 4-6kHz stood out as edgy and sharp, almost sibilant at times, in casual listening - the predicted in-room response shows a lack of energy between 1-2kHz and a bit too much above that, which one reviewer thought would sound bright. Distortion at 96dB SPL/1m shows two harmonic peaks the reviewer says “should not be there,” one from woofer breakup around 400Hz and another around 7-8kHz from the tweeter, and multitone distortion approaches 10% in the 500-800Hz range at that output level. Real compression shows up even at moderate volume and worsens at 96dB and above, with the woofer clearly giving up around 60-70Hz - a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting to listen loud, since running it full-range at high output costs real dynamic range in the midbass and bass. Don’t place it close to a wall - boundary reinforcement adds a midbass bump that undoes the otherwise smooth, linear response. Getting the best out of it takes EQ (taming the 700Hz peak, filling in the 1-2kHz dip, and trimming the highs).

What the Klipsch RP-600M offers: More linear horizontal dispersion than the updated RP-600M II - as you move side-to-side, the tonal character changes less, a genuine advantage for off-axis listening consistency. Takes exceptionally well to EQ correction (miniDSP or similar), letting a knowledgeable owner fix its tonal shortcomings without needing to upgrade. Standard 6.5” woofer/horn-tweeter two-way design with reasonably gradual bass rolloff (F3 ~70Hz, F10 ~40Hz) rather than a steep vented-enclosure cutoff. Watch for: A strong, annoying resonance in the lower vocal range around 300Hz stands out clearly (though it can be EQ’d out). Overall tonal balance is notably less neutral than the newer RP-600M II, with a roughly 3-4dB suckout in the estimated in-room response. The waveguide doesn’t extend flush to the baffle edge, increasing diffraction compared to the redesigned version. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity spec (about 96dB) is a half-space, in-room-style rating roughly 9dB above the true anechoic figure (closer to 85-86dB), which can mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Elevated treble on-axis, similar to its successor, benefits from toe-out or careful placement. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Still needs a subwoofer for real bass weight; a boost around 120Hz gives kick drums their “tambour” without the underlying “meat.”

Buy the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2. It ranks higher for sound quality than the Klipsch RP-600M and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.

If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the Klipsch RP-600M. It ranks near the bottom of the 122 bookshelf speakers, so look higher up the list instead.

Buy the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 at Amazon ($329.00) →Buy the Klipsch RP-600M at Amazon ($343.22) →

ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Klipsch RP-600M

Specifications Side By Side

ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 Klipsch RP-600M
Price$329.00$343.22 Discontinued
Ranked#83 of 122 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#100 of 122 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)73Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Impedance6 ohms nominal, 5.2 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86.5dB (measured, Audio Science Review)85.2dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers25mm tweeter + 165mm woofer6.5" Cerametallic cone woofer, 1" titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn
Weight29.1 lbs / 13.2 kg16.1 lbs / 7.3 kg each
Dimensions14.8"H x 7.7"W x 10.6"D (375.0 x 195.0 x 268.0 mm)15.7"H x 8"W x 11.9"D (398.8 x 203.2 x 302.3 mm)
Woofer Cabinetported, frontported
Discontinued-Yes
Buy the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 at Amazon ($329.00) →Buy the Klipsch RP-600M at Amazon ($343.22) →

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

Prices on this page were last checked August 24, 2026 at 6:53 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2: $329.00 Amazon Crutchfield eBay

ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 ranking card

Pros: Reasonably flat on-axis and listening-window response with reasonably even horizontal directivity, holding about ±60° up to roughly 8kHz for consistent stereo width whether aimed directly at the listener or toed out. Its larger-than-typical woofer lets it play very loud with minimal distortion, staying under about 1% THD down to 50Hz at 86dB, and minimum impedance stays a comfortable 5-6 ohms. In-room bass extension reaches about 50Hz without much trouble, enough for a solid kick-drum sound. Takes equalization very well - correcting the on-axis response doesn’t cost sensitivity through the midrange, and the underlying directivity behavior (diffraction, vertical mismatch) is mild enough that EQ alone gets most of the way to a well-balanced sound. Vertical tolerance is asymmetric and fairly forgiving: about 10° above the tweeter axis and 20° below it before tonal balance meaningfully shifts. One reviewer called it “a good speaker” with “a good price” rather than just good-for-the-price, and found it fairly neutral overall in-room.

Cons: A good size resonant peak around 700Hz stands out from an otherwise smooth response and lingers in cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) measurements - in one reviewer’s sighted A/B test, reducing it by about 5dB via EQ made a noticeable but not dramatic difference. Directivity error shows up around 3.3kHz, and the upper-midrange around 4-6kHz stood out as edgy and sharp, almost sibilant at times, in casual listening - the predicted in-room response shows a lack of energy between 1-2kHz and a bit too much above that, which one reviewer thought would sound bright. Distortion at 96dB SPL/1m shows two harmonic peaks the reviewer says “should not be there,” one from woofer breakup around 400Hz and another around 7-8kHz from the tweeter, and multitone distortion approaches 10% in the 500-800Hz range at that output level. Real compression shows up even at moderate volume and worsens at 96dB and above, with the woofer clearly giving up around 60-70Hz - a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting to listen loud, since running it full-range at high output costs real dynamic range in the midbass and bass. Don’t place it close to a wall - boundary reinforcement adds a midbass bump that undoes the otherwise smooth, linear response. Getting the best out of it takes EQ (taming the 700Hz peak, filling in the 1-2kHz dip, and trimming the highs).

Full ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 review and specifications →

Bass Extension (-10dB)40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions14.8"H x 7.7"W x 10.6"D (375.0 x 195.0 x 268.0 mm)
Drivers25mm tweeter + 165mm woofer
Impedance6 ohms nominal, 5.2 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86.5dB (measured, Audio Science Review)
Weight29.1 lbs / 13.2 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, front
Check current price at Amazon ($329.00) →Check current price at Crutchfield →Search eBay for ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 →

Klipsch RP-600M: $343.22 Discontinued Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-600M ranking card

Pros: More linear horizontal dispersion than the updated RP-600M II - as you move side-to-side, the tonal character changes less, a genuine advantage for off-axis listening consistency. Takes exceptionally well to EQ correction (miniDSP or similar), letting a knowledgeable owner fix its tonal shortcomings without needing to upgrade. Standard 6.5” woofer/horn-tweeter two-way design with reasonably gradual bass rolloff (F3 ~70Hz, F10 ~40Hz) rather than a steep vented-enclosure cutoff.

Cons: A strong, annoying resonance in the lower vocal range around 300Hz stands out clearly (though it can be EQ’d out). Overall tonal balance is notably less neutral than the newer RP-600M II, with a roughly 3-4dB suckout in the estimated in-room response. The waveguide doesn’t extend flush to the baffle edge, increasing diffraction compared to the redesigned version. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity spec (about 96dB) is a half-space, in-room-style rating roughly 9dB above the true anechoic figure (closer to 85-86dB), which can mislead buyers comparing spec sheets. Elevated treble on-axis, similar to its successor, benefits from toe-out or careful placement. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Still needs a subwoofer for real bass weight; a boost around 120Hz gives kick drums their “tambour” without the underlying “meat.”. Discontinued.

Full Klipsch RP-600M review and specifications →

Bass Extension (-10dB)40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)73Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions15.7"H x 8"W x 11.9"D (398.8 x 203.2 x 302.3 mm)
DiscontinuedYes
Drivers6.5" Cerametallic cone woofer, 1" titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85.2dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight16.1 lbs / 7.3 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported
Check current price at Amazon ($343.22) →Search eBay for Klipsch RP-600M →