EarAcoustic STA Pro vs Whizzer HE01

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 3.4/5 (#854 and #862 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($49.90 vs $45), so choose on features and fit.

EarAcoustic STA Pro vs Whizzer HE01

Why pick the EarAcoustic STA Pro: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 67 against the Harman target. The catch: An uneven response, 2.4 dB standard deviation from target.

What the Whizzer HE01 does well: For a budget single dynamic driver earphone it earns a preference score of 66.0 in crinacle’s measurement, with a warm tilt that suits listeners who prefer a relaxed, bass forward sound. The catch: An 8.1 dB dip near 6.4 kHz and a treble band averaging 3.3 dB below target dull cymbals and blunt detail, while a 4.2 dB peak near 11.9 kHz adds an uneven, slightly metallic edge.

Buy the EarAcoustic STA Pro or the Whizzer HE01 on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

EarAcoustic STA Pro

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 67 against the Harman target.

Linsoul $49.90 eBay
$49.90
Whizzer HE01

For a budget single dynamic driver earphone it earns a preference score of 66.0 in crinacle’s measurement, with a warm tilt that suits listeners who prefer a relaxed, bass forward sound.

Amazon $45.00 eBay
$45

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

EarAcoustic STA Pro Whizzer HE01
Price$49.90$45.00
Ranked#854 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#862 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score67 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)66 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.41 dB standard deviation2.78 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.55 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.49 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.9 dB at 30 Hz)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers2 x dynamic drivers (1 x 10mm graphene + 1 x 6mm titanium-plated)-
Impedance18 ohms18 ohms
Sensitivity113 dB112 dB/mW
Frequency Response10Hz - 30kHz15Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Built-in Microphone-No

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

EarAcoustic STA ProWhizzer HE01Harman target
Frequency response of the EarAcoustic STA Pro and Whizzer HE01-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the EarAcoustic STA Pro from avishai, lumerion and pw; the Whizzer HE01 from aftersound, arn and pw, all via squig.link.

More top alternatives to EarAcoustic STA Pro: