Short answer: the Coda Audio HOPS5. It ranks #7 of 16 compact 5 to 6.5-inch pa speakers by sound quality (rated 3.8/5); the Turbosound NuQ62 ranks #11 (rated 3.6/5).
What the Coda Audio HOPS5 does well: High-quality vendor Spinorama data gives preference scores of 3.60 standalone and 6.80 with an ideal subwoofer, and predicted in-room smoothness is a good 0.774. The tradeoff: Bass reaches only about 90Hz (-3dB), and listening-window narrow-band deviation is 0.478, so it sounds thin and slightly uneven without a subwoofer.
Why pick the Turbosound NuQ62: The lowest price in this ranking for a two-way 6.5-inch box from a major PA brand, with a 6.3kg cabinet and 100° x 60° coverage. Watch for: The Spinorama data is low quality, and predicted in-room smoothness of 0.356 is the weakest of the group.
Buy the Coda Audio HOPS5. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Turbosound NuQ62.
Still deciding? The full PA & Live Sound rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Coda Audio HOPS5 | Turbosound NuQ62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | - | - |
| Ranked | #7 of 16 in Compact 5 to 6.5-Inch PA Speakers | #11 of 16 in Compact 5 to 6.5-Inch PA Speakers |
| Configuration | Passive 2-way coaxial PA speaker | Passive 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Drivers | Double 5” coaxial system | 6.5” low-frequency driver, 1” neodymium compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 80Hz - 20kHz (-6dB, manufacturer specified) | - |
| Amplifier Power | Passive speaker; requires external amplification within the 300W AES handling rating | Passive speaker; requires external amplification |
| Power Handling | 300W AES (manufacturer specified) | - |
| Maximum SPL | 124dB peak (manufacturer specified) | 116dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Coverage | 100° x 100° | 100° x 60° |
| DSP | No (passive) | No (passive) |
| IP Rating | IP54 | - |
| Weight | 14.1 lbs (6.4 kg) | 13.9 lbs (6.3 kg) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 90Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) | 73Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.60 | 3.39 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.80 | 6.14 |
| XLR Input | No | No |
| RCA Input | No | No |
| TRS Input | No | No |
| Optical Input | No | No |
| Coaxial Input | No | No |
| USB Input | No | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | No |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Guitar Input | No | No |
| Dimensions | - | 13.8”H x 7.5”W x 8.3”D (350 x 190 x 210 mm) |
| Sensitivity | - | 88dB |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Coda Audio HOPS5 compares with other leading options:
- Alcons Audio VR5 V1 vs Coda Audio HOPS5
- L-Acoustics X6i vs Coda Audio HOPS5
- Coda Audio HOPS5 vs EAW MKC60
- Coda Audio HOPS5 vs Kling Freitag CA 106 Pro
- Coda Audio HOPS5 vs Alcons Audio SR9
Prices on this page were last checked September 26, 2026 at 11:14 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Coda Audio HOPS5 Passive eBay
Pros: High-quality vendor Spinorama data gives preference scores of 3.60 standalone and 6.80 with an ideal subwoofer, and predicted in-room smoothness is a good 0.774. The IP54 rated 6.4kg cabinet has wide 100° x 100° coverage and reaches 124dB. Measured bass extension of 90Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Bass reaches only about 90Hz (-3dB), and listening-window narrow-band deviation is 0.478, so it sounds thin and slightly uneven without a subwoofer. It is passive and needs an external amplifier and processor.
Full Coda Audio HOPS5 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | Passive speaker; requires external amplification within the 300W AES handling rating |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 90Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Configuration | Passive 2-way coaxial PA speaker |
| Coverage | 100° x 100° |
| DSP | No (passive) |
| Drivers | Double 5” coaxial system |
| Frequency Response | 80Hz - 20kHz (-6dB, manufacturer specified) |
| Guitar Input | No |
| HDMI Input | No |
| IP Rating | IP54 |
| Maximum SPL | 124dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Microphone Input | No |
| Optical Input | No |
| Power Handling | 300W AES (manufacturer specified) |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.60 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.80 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 14.1 lbs (6.4 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Turbosound NuQ62 Passive B&H Photo Video eBay
Pros: The lowest price in this ranking for a two-way 6.5-inch box from a major PA brand, with a 6.3kg cabinet and 100° x 60° coverage. Bass reaches about 73Hz (-3dB) in vendor Spinorama data, with preference scores of 3.39 standalone and 6.14 with an ideal subwoofer. Measured bass extension of 73Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The Spinorama data is low quality, and predicted in-room smoothness of 0.356 is the weakest of the group. Maximum output of 116dB is modest, and it is passive, so an amplifier is required.
Full Turbosound NuQ62 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | Passive speaker; requires external amplification |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 73Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Configuration | Passive 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Coverage | 100° x 60° |
| DSP | No (passive) |
| Dimensions | 13.8”H x 7.5”W x 8.3”D (350 x 190 x 210 mm) |
| Drivers | 6.5” low-frequency driver, 1” neodymium compression driver |
| Guitar Input | No |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Maximum SPL | 116dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Microphone Input | No |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Sensitivity | 88dB |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.39 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.14 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 13.9 lbs (6.3 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons