Short answer: the W-King D320 for features, the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen for simplicity. The D320 packs 40W, IP67 waterproofing, 24 hour battery life, an EQ app with 6 modes, Bluetooth 5.3, AUX and MicroSD, dual tweeters with passive radiators and USB-C, but it is not stereo, has a warm tuning, lacks some detail and has rolled off treble. The Flex 2nd gen is not stereo and its warm, overly boosted bass drowns out midrange detail.
The case for the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen: It sounds pretty much identical to the 1st gen. The catch: it’s not stereo, sounds warm with overly boosted bass that drowns out midrange detail, and self drains the battery about 10% a week.
Buy the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen when sound quality outweighs the price for you, and the W-King D320 when the price outweighs sound quality instead.
If battery life is a priority, the W-King D320 is rated for 24 hours versus 12 hours for the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen.
Still deciding? The full Portable Bluetooth rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen | W-King D320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $159.00 | $69.99 |
| Ranked | #35 of 145 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #47 of 145 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes | Yes |
| EQ | Yes (3 band) | Yes |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Party Mode | Yes (Bose Party mode) | - |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Stereo | No | No |
| Omnidirectional | No | No |
| TWS | Yes | No |
| Weight | 1.3 lbs (586 g) | 3.1 lbs (1.4 kg) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Dimensions | 7.9” x 3.5” x 2” (201 x 90 x 52 mm) | 3.3” x 8.4” (83 x 214 mm) (diameter x height) |
| Aux Input | No | Yes |
| Drivers | 60mm full-range driver with passive radiators | 52mm x 91mm woofer, 2x 25mm tweeters + 2x passive radiators |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Digital Aux Input | No | No |
| Strap | Yes (built-in loop) | - |
| MicroSD Playback | - | Yes |
| Frequency Response | - | 100Hz - 18kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Amplifier Power | - | 40W |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen:
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Earfun Uboom L
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Soundcore Motion 300
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Soundcore Motion+
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Soundcore Boost “upgraded” 2021
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Minirig 4
Prices on this page were last checked September 26, 2026 at 11:14 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen: $159.00 Amazon eBay
Older model: the Bose Soundlink Flex (ranked lower, rated 3.8/5).
Pros: A very portable 586g, IP67-rated speaker with a clear, well-balanced midrange that keeps voices and instruments intelligible. The second generation adds a Bose app with 3-band EQ, better-placed controls and stereo pairing with another Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen. It supports AAC and aptX Adaptive in addition to SBC, making it a stronger wireless option than most small rivals.
Cons: One Flex remains mono and cannot deliver genuine low-bass rumble; RTINGS also found the elevated treble can turn hi-hats and other high-frequency detail piercing. The claimed battery life is only 12 hours, and some owners report accelerated standby drain after firmware updates. It is expensive for its size, so the added app and codec support, not a transformational sound upgrade over the original, are the main reasons to choose it.
Full Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen review and specifications →
| App | Yes |
|---|---|
| Aux Input | No |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 7.9” x 3.5” x 2” (201 x 90 x 52 mm) |
| Drivers | 60mm full-range driver with passive radiators |
| EQ | Yes (3 band) |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Bose Party mode) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | Yes (built-in loop) |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.3 lbs (586 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Joy & Oluv’Sone: Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Flex More from Oluv’Sone →
- Oluv Patreon: Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen - sound demo
- Tô Thái Trí Hùng: Unbox & Sound Test - Bose Soundlink Flex 2
- Joy & Oluv’Sone: Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen & Soundcore Motion 300 sound test
- Alan Ross: Hall of Fame classic vs latest Bose tech! More from alanrossreviews →
- CEONTHEMAKING: Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd Gen VS Marshall Emberton III - What’s NEW?? More from CEONTHEMAKING →
- Alan Ross - The Anti Shill!: Small speaker, mighty sound, The Flex gen 2 shatters physics!
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Bose Soundlink Flex
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Tribit Xsound Plus 2
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs JBL Charge Essential 2
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Teufel Rockster XS
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Huawei Sound Joy
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Cleer Audio Scene
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
- Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Soundcore Boom 3i
- See all 121 comparisons
W-King D320: $69.99 AliExpress eBay
Pros: A 1.4kg, IP67-rated travel speaker with claimed 40W output, USB-C charging, aux and microSD playback, speakerphone capability and an app with adjustable EQ. Owner reports praise its loud, deep-for-size bass and long runtime, while its two tweeters and passive radiators make it a capable choice for casual outdoor listening.
Cons: A single D320 is not stereo, and its warm balance trades away some detail and upper-treble air. The claimed 100Hz low-frequency specification suggests that its perceived bass should not be mistaken for true sub-bass; evaluate its tuning with the app rather than expecting a neutral default.
Full W-King D320 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 40W |
|---|---|
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Battery Life | 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 3.3” x 8.4” (83 x 214 mm) (diameter x height) |
| Drivers | 52mm x 91mm woofer, 2x 25mm tweeters + 2x passive radiators |
| EQ | Yes |
| Frequency Response | 100Hz - 18kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| MicroSD Playback | Yes |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| TWS | No |
| Weight | 3.1 lbs (1.4 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Techder Audios: W-king D320 VS Mifa Wildrod "DUAL VS SINGLE TWEETERS!" More from techderaudios →
- Audio y Mas 🔊: Altavoces JBL Flip 6 vs W-King D320: ¿Cuál es el mejor en calidad de sonido? 🔊
- Jay’s Straight Up Reviews & More: Ultimate Ears MegaBoom 4 vs W-King D320 🔋Does Paying More Get You Less? 😧 More from JaysStraightUpReviews →
- Head-to-Head Comparisons


