Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Marshall Emberton II

Last updated: October 12, 2026

Short answer: the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen. It ranks #37 of 175 medium speakers by sound quality, rated 3.8/5, at $99.99; the Marshall Emberton II ranks #127, rated 2.7/5, and costs $144.99, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.

Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen vs Marshall Emberton II

The Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen is the better-sounding choice. A very portable 1.3 lbs (586 g), IP67-rated speaker with a clear, well-balanced midrange that keeps voices and instruments intelligible. It supports aptX Adaptive Bluetooth, which the Marshall Emberton II lacks. Watch for: One Flex remains mono and cannot deliver genuine low-bass rumble; RTINGS also found the elevated treble can turn hi-hats and other high-frequency detail piercing.

The Marshall Emberton II is the longer-running option. 30 hour battery life: among the best in its class; a 20 min quick-charge gives 4 hours. It is rated for 30 hours of battery against 12 for the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen. It plays in stereo from a single unit, unlike the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen. Watch for: Strange unnatural echo-like sound coloration, bass not as deep as competitors.

Buy the Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Marshall Emberton II and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.

Want more options? Browse the full Portable Bluetooth rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen Marshall Emberton II
Price$99.99$144.99
Ranked#37 of 175 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers#127 of 175 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers
AppYesYes
Battery Life12 hours (Manufacturer specified)30 hours (Manufacturer specified)
Built-in MicrophoneYesNo
EQYes (3 band)Yes (3 presets via app)
IP RatingIP67IP67
Party ModeYes (Bose Party mode)Yes (Marshall Stack)
Power InputUSB-CUSB-C
StereoNoYes
OmnidirectionalNoYes
TWSYesNo
Weight1.3 lbs (586 g)1.5 lbs (700 g)
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth Version5.35.1
Dimensions7.9” x 3.5” x 2” (201 x 90 x 52 mm)6.3” x 2.7” x 3” (160 x 68 x 76 mm)
Aux InputNoNo
Drivers60mm full-range driver with passive radiators2x 2” full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators
Bluetooth CodecsSBC, AAC, aptX AdaptiveSBC
Digital Aux InputNoNo
StrapYes (built-in loop)No
Bass Extension (-10dB)-62Hz
Bluetooth Latency-80ms
Maximum SPL-88dB (measured by Alan Ross Reviews)
Power Bank-No
Amplifier Power-20W

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen:

Prices on this page were last checked October 12, 2026 at 4:13 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen ranking card

Older model: the Bose Soundlink Flex (ranked lower, rated 3.8/5). See every Bose SoundLink Flex, Micro, Max and Plus generation.

Same family: the Bose SoundLink Max (larger model, rated 4.3/5), the Bose Soundlink Micro 2 (larger model, rated 3.6/5) and the Bose SoundLink Plus (larger model, rated 4.2/5).

Pros: A very portable 586g, IP67-rated speaker with a clear, well-balanced midrange that keeps voices and instruments intelligible. The second generation adds a Bose app with 3-band EQ, better-placed controls and stereo pairing with another Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen. It supports AAC and aptX Adaptive in addition to SBC, making it a stronger wireless option than most small rivals.

Cons: One Flex remains mono and cannot deliver genuine low-bass rumble; RTINGS also found the elevated treble can turn hi-hats and other high-frequency detail piercing. The claimed battery life is only 12 hours, and some owners report accelerated standby drain after firmware updates. It is expensive for its size, so the added app and codec support, not a transformational sound upgrade over the original, are the main reasons to choose it.

ReleasedSep 2024 (2 years ago)
AppYes
Aux InputNo
Battery Life12 hours (Manufacturer specified)
BluetoothYes
Bluetooth CodecsSBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Bluetooth Version5.3
Built-in MicrophoneYes
Digital Aux InputNo
Dimensions7.9” x 3.5” x 2” (201 x 90 x 52 mm)
Drivers60mm full-range driver with passive radiators
EQYes (3 band)
IP RatingIP67
OmnidirectionalNo
Party ModeYes (Bose Party mode)
Power InputUSB-C
StereoNo
StrapYes (built-in loop)
TWSYes
Weight1.3 lbs (586 g)

Marshall Emberton II: $144.99 Amazon $144.99 eBay

Marshall Emberton II ranking card

Newer model: the Marshall Emberton III, ranked higher, rated 2.7/5, released Aug 2024. It adds built-in mic.

Older model: the Marshall Emberton (ranked lower, estimated 2.6/5). See every Marshall Portable Speakers generation.

Pros: 30 hour battery life: among the best in its class; a 20 min quick-charge gives 4 hours. IP67 rated, durable rubbery build using 50% recycled plastic. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-10dB).

Cons: Strange unnatural echo-like sound coloration, bass not as deep as competitors. Not technically a 360 speaker, only front and rear. Not very loud.

ReleasedMay 2022 (4 years ago)
Amplifier Power20W
AppYes
Aux InputNo
Bass Extension (-10dB)62Hz
Battery Life30 hours (Manufacturer specified)
BluetoothYes
Bluetooth CodecsSBC
Bluetooth Latency80ms
Bluetooth Version5.1
Built-in MicrophoneNo
Digital Aux InputNo
Dimensions6.3” x 2.7” x 3” (160 x 68 x 76 mm)
Drivers2x 2” full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators
EQYes (3 presets via app)
IP RatingIP67
Maximum SPL88dB (measured by Alan Ross Reviews)
OmnidirectionalYes
Party ModeYes (Marshall Stack)
Power BankNo
Power InputUSB-C
StereoYes
StrapNo
TWSNo
Weight1.5 lbs (700 g)