BGVP Astrum vs SoftEars RSV

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the BGVP Astrum. It ranks #235 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.3/5, at $699; the SoftEars RSV ranks #264, rated 4.2/5, and costs $729, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.

BGVP Astrum vs SoftEars RSV

Why pick the BGVP Astrum: The median of 10 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 77 with a 1.49 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: Its 1.49 dB spread is less even than the best measured sets.

The case for the SoftEars RSV: Its preference score of 76 from crinacle’s measurement comes with just 1.76 dB of deviation, so tonal balance is smooth and natural. Watch for: Presence runs about 2.9 dB below target, giving vocals and guitars a slightly laid back edge, and a 4 dB dip near 10.3 kHz trims some sparkle.

Buy the BGVP Astrum. It is rated higher for sound quality than the SoftEars RSV and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.

BGVP Astrum

The median of 10 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 77 with a 1.49 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.

BGVP $699.00 eBay
$699
SoftEars RSV

Its preference score of 76 from crinacle’s measurement comes with just 1.76 dB of deviation, so tonal balance is smooth and natural.

Amazon $729.00 eBay
$729

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

BGVP Astrum SoftEars RSV
Price$699.00$729.00
Ranked#235 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#264 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeTribridBalanced armature
Drivers2 x 8mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature + 2 x electrostatic5 x balanced armature
Impedance12 ohms8 ohms
Sensitivity111 dB/Vrms125 dB/Vrms
Frequency Response20Hz - 40kHz5Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score77 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)76 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target1.49 dB standard deviation1.76 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.42 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.39 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.0 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-3.1 dB at 30 Hz)
Built-in Microphone-No

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

BGVP AstrumSoftEars RSVHarman target
Frequency response of the BGVP Astrum and SoftEars RSV-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the BGVP Astrum from aden, animagus, audioamigo, dchpgall, faxepremium, hu-fi, jaytiss, pw, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk; the SoftEars RSV from animagus, atechreviews, bukanaudiophile, cammyfi, dchpgall, dl, eliseaudio, iemocean, iemworld, jaytiss, loomynarty, mmagtech, nymz, precog, pw, scboy, seanwee, sl0the, superreview, timmyv and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.

More top alternatives to BGVP Astrum: