ARTPICAL Lucifer vs DUNU DK3001BD

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the DUNU DK3001BD. Both are rated 4.1/5 for sound quality (#322 and #359 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the DUNU DK3001BD costs $485 against $500 for the ARTPICAL Lucifer, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.

ARTPICAL Lucifer vs DUNU DK3001BD

Why pick the ARTPICAL Lucifer: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 75 against the Harman target. Watch for: The rating reflects sound quality only; comfort, build and noise isolation are not part of the score.

Why pick the DUNU DK3001BD: The median of 23 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 75 with a 1.54 dB spread. Watch for: Presence sits about 4.2 dB low with a 5.3 dB dip near 4.0 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.

Buy the DUNU DK3001BD. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $15 less than the ARTPICAL Lucifer.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.

ARTPICAL Lucifer

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 75 against the Harman target.

MusicTeck $500 eBay
$500
DUNU DK3001BD

The median of 23 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 75 with a 1.54 dB spread.

Amazon $485.00 eBay
$485

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

ARTPICAL Lucifer DUNU DK3001BD
Price$500$485.00
Ranked#359 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#322 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score75 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)75 (median of 23 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target1.72 dB standard deviation1.54 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.39 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.41 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.2 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.5 dB at 30 Hz)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicHybrid (1 dynamic + 4 balanced armature + 4 planar)
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic1 x dynamic + 4 x balanced armature + 4 x planar
Impedance64 ohms26 ohms
Sensitivity106.6 dB/mW108 dB/mW
Frequency Response-5Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

ARTPICAL LuciferDUNU DK3001BDHarman target
Frequency response of the ARTPICAL Lucifer and DUNU DK3001BD-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the ARTPICAL Lucifer from aftersound, audioamigo, dl, gadgetgenerations, hu-fi, soundignity and treblewellxtended; the DUNU DK3001BD from aden, aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, dl, fahryst, flare, hobbytalk, hu-fi, jaytiss, joycesreview, koi, kr0mka, obodio, practiphile, precog, pw, regancipher, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, timmyv and vsg, all via squig.link.

More worthwhile head-to-heads for DUNU DK3001BD: