Short answer: the Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S. It ranks #35 of 212 subwoofers by sound quality, rated 3.9/5, at $1,650. The ELAC Varro RS700 ranks #76, rated 3.8/5, at $1,599, $51 cheaper, a saving that is not big enough to make up the sound-quality gap.
Why pick the Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S: Premium finish and packing.
The case for the ELAC Varro RS700: 12-inch aluminum sandwich driver with high-excursion HEX surround in a rigid sealed enclosure, backed by 700W RMS BASH power. Watch for: High power consumption and heavy 61-lb cabinet.
Buy the Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $51 you would save on the ELAC Varro RS700 does not close the gap.
About the ratings: the ELAC Varro RS700’s rating is estimated from measured siblings and predecessors rather than its own measurements, with a likely range of 3.6 to 4.0, so this verdict could change once it is measured.
Still deciding? The full Subwoofers rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S | ELAC Varro RS700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,650 | $1,599.00 |
| Ranked | #35 of 212 in Medium Home Subwoofers (30-75 lbs) | #76 of 212 in Medium Home Subwoofers (30-75 lbs) Estimated |
| Enclosure | sealed | sealed |
| Output SPL at 12.5 Hz | 86.5 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 15 Hz | 93.0 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 20 Hz | 98.5 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 25 Hz | 104.1 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 31.5 Hz | 108.5 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 40 Hz | 113.2 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 50 Hz | 117.0 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 63 Hz | 118.5 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 80 Hz | 118.6 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 100 Hz | 118.5 dB | - |
| Output SPL at 125 Hz | 118.1 dB | - |
| CEA-2010-A Average (40-80Hz) | 116.8 dB | - |
| Dimensions | 18.9”H x 13.2”W x 17.7”D (479.8 x 334.8 x 449.8 mm) | 17.2”H x 16.4”W x 16.4”D (437 x 416 x 416 mm) |
| Weight | 54 lbs (24.5 kg) | 61.3 lbs (27.8 kg) |
| Warranty | 10/5 | 3/1 |
| Cabinet Color | black, white | - |
| Country | Norway | Germany |
| Measurement Source | Audioholics | - |
| Frequency Response | 19-200Hz, ±3dB | 17Hz - 150Hz (in-room, manufacturer specified) |
| Amplifier Power | 800W RMS | 700W RMS / 1400W peak (BASH) |
| Drivers | 13.8” (351mm) driver | 12” (305mm) aluminum-sandwich cone with HEX surround |
| Inputs | XLR (balanced), RCA | - |
| XLR Input | Yes | - |
| RCA Input | Yes | - |
| TRS Input | No | - |
| Optical Input | No | - |
| Coaxial Input | No | - |
| USB Input | No | - |
| HDMI Input | No | - |
| AES Input | No | - |
| Aux Input | No | - |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S compares with other leading options:
- Monoprice SW-15 vs Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S
- SVS SB-3000 vs Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S
- Rythmik E15 vs Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S
- Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S vs REL Acoustics T/9x
- Genelec 7050C vs Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S: $1,650 Arendal Sound eBay
Same family: the Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1V (larger subwoofer, rated 3.9/5), the Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 2S (larger subwoofer, rated 4.1/5) and the Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 2V (larger subwoofer, rated 4.2/5).
Pros: Premium finish and packing. Tight and precise bass with suppleness and dynamics at higher price point. 7-band parametric EQ for room correction. App control (iOS/Android). Flexible driver configuration.
Full Arendal 1723 Subwoofer 1S review and specifications →
| Released | Sep 2020 (6 years ago) |
|---|---|
| AES Input | No |
| Amplifier Power | 800W RMS |
| Aux Input | No |
| CEA-2010-A Average (40-80Hz) | 116.8 dB |
| Cabinet Color | black, white |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Country | Norway |
| Dimensions | 18.9”H x 13.2”W x 17.7”D (479.8 x 334.8 x 449.8 mm) |
| Drivers | 13.8” (351mm) driver |
| Enclosure | sealed |
| Frequency Response | 19-200Hz, ±3dB |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR (balanced), RCA |
| Measurement Source | Audioholics |
| Optical Input | No |
| Output SPL at 12.5 Hz | 86.5 dB |
| Output SPL at 15 Hz | 93.0 dB |
| Output SPL at 20 Hz | 98.5 dB |
| Output SPL at 25 Hz | 104.1 dB |
| Output SPL at 31.5 Hz | 108.5 dB |
| Output SPL at 40 Hz | 113.2 dB |
| Output SPL at 50 Hz | 117.0 dB |
| Output SPL at 63 Hz | 118.5 dB |
| Output SPL at 80 Hz | 118.6 dB |
| Output SPL at 100 Hz | 118.5 dB |
| Output SPL at 125 Hz | 118.1 dB |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Warranty | 10/5 |
| Weight | 54 lbs (24.5 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Independently measured by Audioholics; the published figures above come from this ASR subwoofer measurement thread.
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
ELAC Varro RS700: $1,599.00 Estimated Amazon Crutchfield eBay
Same family: the ELAC Varro RS500 (smaller subwoofer, ranked lower, estimated 3.6/5).
Pros: 12-inch aluminum sandwich driver with high-excursion HEX surround in a rigid sealed enclosure, backed by 700W RMS BASH power. Combines clean musical speed with powerful low-end impact and app-based AutoEQ.
Cons: High power consumption and heavy 61-lb cabinet. Deep infrasonic output is limited by sealed acoustic suspension design compared to vented subwoofers.
Full ELAC Varro RS700 review and specifications →
| Released | 2023 (3 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 700W RMS / 1400W peak (BASH) |
| Country | Germany |
| Dimensions | 17.2”H x 16.4”W x 16.4”D (437 x 416 x 416 mm) |
| Drivers | 12” (305mm) aluminum-sandwich cone with HEX surround |
| Enclosure | sealed |
| Frequency Response | 17Hz - 150Hz (in-room, manufacturer specified) |
| Warranty | 3/1 |
| Weight | 61.3 lbs (27.8 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- No independent measurement review is linked for this model; it is ranked from hands-on listening and comparison against similarly priced speakers.
- Head-to-Head Comparisons