AFUL Explorer vs Letshuoer S08

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Letshuoer S08. Both are rated 3.1/5 for sound quality (#966 and #965 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Letshuoer S08 costs $99 against $119.99 for the AFUL Explorer, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.

AFUL Explorer vs Letshuoer S08

Why pick the AFUL Explorer: Bass extends flat to 20 Hz and sits on target across 38 measurements, giving full, even low end without boom. The catch: The presence region is about 7 dB low with an 8.6 dB dip near 4.1 kHz, the deepest in this group, so vocals sound distant and instruments lose definition.

What the Letshuoer S08 does well: Its 13 mm planar driver keeps bass full and extended to 20 Hz across 29 measurements, with lower mids close to target. The tradeoff: The presence region is about 6 dB low with a 7.7 dB dip near 3.5 kHz, so vocals sound recessed and lack clarity.

Buy the Letshuoer S08. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $20.99 less than the AFUL Explorer.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

AFUL Explorer

Bass extends flat to 20 Hz and sits on target across 38 measurements, giving full, even low end without boom.

Amazon $119.99 eBay
$119.99
Letshuoer S08

Its 13 mm planar driver keeps bass full and extended to 20 Hz across 29 measurements, with lower mids close to target.

Amazon $99.00 eBay
$99

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

AFUL Explorer Letshuoer S08
Price$119.99$99.00
Ranked#965 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#966 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeHybridPlanar
Drivers1 x 8mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature1 x 13mm planar magnetic
Impedance26 ohms26 ohms
Sensitivity108 dB/mW-
Frequency Response10Hz - 30kHz (Manufacturer specified)20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score63 (median of 38 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)63 (median of 29 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.68 dB standard deviation2.73 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.99 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.75 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.0 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.4 dB at 30 Hz)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

AFUL ExplorerLetshuoer S08Harman target
Frequency response of the AFUL Explorer and Letshuoer S08-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the AFUL Explorer from aden, adri-n, atechreviews, audioamigo, awsmdanny, banzai1122, bassaudio, boizoff, breampike, bryaudioreviews, dvewlsh, eplv, fahryst, flare, gadgetrytech, hadoe, hoods, hu-fi, iemocean, iemworld, jaytiss, koi, kuping-sensi, listener, lown-fi, lumerion, obodio, practiphile, precog, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, theaudiostore, therollo9, timmyv and treblewellxtended; the Letshuoer S08 from achoreviews, aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, awsmdanny, banzai1122, breampike, cqtek, csi-zone, eplv, fahryst, flare, gadgetrytech, hadoe, hbb, jaytiss, koi, kuping-sensi, listener, lown-fi, lumerion, obodio, practiphile, pw, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, tonedeafmonk and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.

How AFUL Explorer compares with other leading options: