Klipsch RP-600M II vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2

Last updated: August 18, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch RP-600M II for better sound quality, the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 for the lower price. The Klipsch RP-600M II ranks #53 of 100 bookshelf speakers at $489.99. The ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 ranks #62 at $329, $160.99 cheaper.

What the Klipsch RP-600M II gets right: Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. The catch: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot - even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects - and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced.

The case for the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2: Reasonably flat on-axis and listening-window response with reasonably even horizontal directivity, holding about ±60° up to roughly 8kHz for consistent stereo width whether aimed directly at the listener or toed out. The tradeoff: A good size resonant peak around 700Hz stands out from an otherwise smooth response and lingers in cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) measurements - in one reviewer’s sighted A/B test.

Buy the Klipsch RP-600M II if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 if the price matters more than sound quality.

Klipsch RP-600M II vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-600M II ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
Price$489.99$329.00
Ranked#53 of 100 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#62 of 100 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)64Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions15.7"H x 8"W x 12.5"D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm)14.8"H x 7.7"W x 10.6"D (375.0 x 195.0 x 268.0 mm)
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)6 ohms nominal, 5.2 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)86.5dB (measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers6.5" Cerametallic cone woofer, 1" titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn25mm tweeter + 165mm woofer
Weight13 lbs / 5.9 kg each29.1 lbs / 13.2 kg
Woofer Cabinetportedported, front

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch RP-600M II: $489.99 Amazon

Klipsch RP-600M II ranking card

Pros: Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. Roughly 10-20° wider horizontal radiation than the original, giving more soundstage envelopment while retaining precise imaging. A major step up in overall tonal neutrality compared to the original RP-600M, largely eliminating that model’s midrange resonance issues. Unusually, sounds better with the grille on - the grille smooths out the elevated treble rather than degrading the sound, a rare trait among speakers the reviewer has tested. More refined back-panel hardware, including anodized binding posts and jumper cables for optional bi-amping. Responds well to EQ correction (verified using measurement software and a miniDSP), letting the on-axis response be made genuinely linear.

Cons: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot - even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects - and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced. Horizontal dispersion is very slightly less linear across angles than the original RP-600M, a minor trade-off for the wider overall radiation pattern. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity (about 94.5dB) is, like the original, a half-space rating roughly 9dB above the anechoic reality (closer to 85-86dB). In-room bass rolls off around 60Hz in practice, and a 120Hz boost paired with a midrange scoop gives kick drums their “tambour” without real low-end weight - a subwoofer is still recommended. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Toeing the speaker out for better on-axis tonality (rather than using the grille) introduces slightly more diffuse imaging from added sidewall reflections.

Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions15.7"H x 8"W x 12.5"D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm)
Drivers6.5" Cerametallic cone woofer, 1" titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight13 lbs / 5.9 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2: $329.00 Amazon Crutchfield

ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 ranking card

Pros: Reasonably flat on-axis and listening-window response with reasonably even horizontal directivity, holding about ±60° up to roughly 8kHz for consistent stereo width whether aimed directly at the listener or toed out. Its larger-than-typical woofer lets it play very loud with minimal distortion, staying under about 1% THD down to 50Hz at 86dB, and minimum impedance stays a comfortable 5-6 ohms. In-room bass extension reaches about 50Hz without much trouble, enough for a solid kick-drum sound. Takes equalization very well - correcting the on-axis response doesn’t cost sensitivity through the midrange, and the underlying directivity behavior (diffraction, vertical mismatch) is mild enough that EQ alone gets most of the way to a well-balanced sound. Vertical tolerance is asymmetric and fairly forgiving: about 10° above the tweeter axis and 20° below it before tonal balance meaningfully shifts. One reviewer called it “a good speaker” with “a good price” rather than just good-for-the-price, and found it fairly neutral overall in-room.

Cons: A good size resonant peak around 700Hz stands out from an otherwise smooth response and lingers in cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) measurements - in one reviewer’s sighted A/B test, reducing it by about 5dB via EQ made a noticeable but not dramatic difference. Directivity error shows up around 3.3kHz, and the upper-midrange around 4-6kHz stood out as edgy and sharp, almost sibilant at times, in casual listening - the predicted in-room response shows a lack of energy between 1-2kHz and a bit too much above that, which one reviewer thought would sound bright. Distortion at 96dB SPL/1m shows two harmonic peaks the reviewer says “should not be there,” one from woofer breakup around 400Hz and another around 7-8kHz from the tweeter, and multitone distortion approaches 10% in the 500-800Hz range at that output level. Real compression shows up even at moderate volume and worsens at 96dB and above, with the woofer clearly giving up around 60-70Hz - a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting to listen loud, since running it full-range at high output costs real dynamic range in the midbass and bass. Don’t place it close to a wall - boundary reinforcement adds a midbass bump that undoes the otherwise smooth, linear response. Getting the best out of it takes EQ (taming the 700Hz peak, filling in the 1-2kHz dip, and trimming the highs).

Bass Extension (-10dB)40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions14.8"H x 7.7"W x 10.6"D (375.0 x 195.0 x 268.0 mm)
Drivers25mm tweeter + 165mm woofer
Impedance6 ohms nominal, 5.2 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86.5dB (measured, Audio Science Review)
Weight29.1 lbs / 13.2 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, front

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.