KEF Blade Two Meta vs KEF R5 Meta

Last updated: October 15, 2026

Short answer: the KEF Blade Two Meta for dispersion breadth, the R5 Meta for a smaller Uni-Q with a sub. The R5 Meta’s 12th generation 5 inch Uni-Q with Metamaterial Absorption Technology tracks off axis near-identically with controlled ±50° horizontal and vertical directivity, but its F3 of 52Hz and F10 of 38Hz call for a subwoofer crossed at 80Hz. The Blade Two Meta matches about 50 degrees both ways.

KEF Blade Two Meta vs KEF R5 Meta

Buy the KEF Blade Two Meta. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the KEF R5 Meta is discontinued, so it is only available used.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

KEF Blade Two Meta

True point-source coaxial design (four 6.5in mid-bass drivers flanking a coincident mid/tweeter) with matched ~50 degree horizontal and vertical dispersion, unusual for a multi-driver speaker.

eBay
$28,000per pair
KEF R5 Meta Discontinued

12th generation 5” Uni-Q coaxial driver array with Metamaterial Absorption Technology (MAT) delivers remarkably smooth, controlled horizontal (±50°) and vertical directivity with near-identical off-axis tracking.

eBay
$3,999.99per pair

Prices on this page were last checked October 15, 2026 at 5:41 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

KEF Blade Two Meta KEF R5 Meta
Price$28,000 per pair only sold in stores$3,999.99 per pair Discontinued
Ranked#3 of 228 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#14 of 228 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)26Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)52Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions46.6”H x 13.5”W x 14.8”D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)42.2”H x 10.7”W x 13.6”D (1073 x 273 x 346 mm)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.3 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone, force cancelling woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeter1 in. vented aluminum dome tweeter with MAT, 5 in. aluminum cone midrange, two 5.25 in. hybrid aluminum cone woofers
Sensitivity86.8dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)86dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Weight79.4 lbs (36 kg) each54 lbs (24.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, rear
Spinorama Preference Score6.996.33
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub8.118.07
DIY KitNoNo

Frequency Response Compared

Both speakers’ spinorama measurements, overlaid. A flatter line is more neutral: peaks sound forward or harsh, dips sound recessed. Each curve is shifted so its average from 300 Hz to 3 kHz sits at 0 dB, so loudness differences between the two are removed and only the shape is compared.

Listening window: the sound arriving straight at you, averaged over a small window around the listening position.
KEF Blade Two MetaKEF R5 Meta
Listening window of the KEF Blade Two Meta and KEF R5 Meta-24-18-12-60+6dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k
Estimated in-room response: what a typical room adds: reflections from walls and the floor make it tilt down toward the treble, and a gentle, even tilt is ideal.
KEF Blade Two MetaKEF R5 Meta
Estimated in-room response of the KEF Blade Two Meta and KEF R5 Meta-24-18-12-60+6dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: KEF Blade Two Meta (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) and KEF R5 Meta (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner), via spinorama.org.

More worthwhile head-to-heads for KEF Blade Two Meta: